Intermediate

Case Study: How LTCM's Statistical Arbitrage Strategy Failed

In 1998 a hedge fund run by two Nobel laureates and Wall Street's best bond arbitrageurs lost roughly USD 4.6 billion in under five months and had to be rescued by a Federal Reserve-brokered consortium of 14 banks. Long-Term Capital Management's edge was relative-value and convergence trading, the direct ancestor of today's statistical arbitrage: buy the cheap twin, sell the expensive one, wait for the spread to close. This case study rebuilds the trades, the leverage and the risk models, walks through the Russian default and the August-September 1998 unwind, and dissects why a strategy that was right on average still blew up. Built for aspiring quant analysts, prop desk applicants and traders systematizing a pairs or spread strategy, with every lesson mapped to NSE pairs trades, arbitrage funds, SEBI margining and Indian liquidity crises.

Statistical ArbitrageConvergence TradingLeverageValue at RiskLiquidity RiskCrowded Trades
MODULES
4
DURATION
4 Hours
TRACK
Quantitative Finance

What You'll Master

Explain how LTCM's convergence trades worked, from on-the-run versus off-the-run Treasuries to the Royal Dutch/Shell pair, and how they relate to modern statistical arbitrage
Reconstruct how roughly USD 4.7 billion of equity supported a balance sheet above USD 100 billion and over USD 1 trillion of derivatives notional
Trace the Russian default of August 1998 and the flight to liquidity that pushed every LTCM spread wider at the same time
Diagnose the model failures: correlations that went to one, fat tails, VaR built on calm-period data and the absence of a liquidity haircut
Apply the lessons to Indian stat arb: cointegration pairs on NSE, cash-futures arbitrage, SEBI peak margin rules and the Franklin Templeton and IL&FS liquidity episodes
Access Level
LEARNER
Everything included
Full Text Playbooks
Actionable Exercises
Mobile Reading Mode
Lifetime Updates

Curriculum Breakdown